<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006/2007 Monte Carlo SS Future Classic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chevysupersport.net/future-classics/20062007-monte-carlo-ss-future-classic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chevysupersport.net/future-classics/20062007-monte-carlo-ss-future-classic</link>
	<description>Chevy SS - Express our devotion to a piece of automotive history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c4822</title>
		<link>http://chevysupersport.net/future-classics/20062007-monte-carlo-ss-future-classic/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>c4822</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chevysupersport.net/?p=430#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Alright - I know the name &quot;Super Sport&quot; is pretty awesome to stamp on any Chevy and especially a Monte Carlo, but honestly there are no more real Super Sports, not after 1972 - that was it..  The 2006/2007 Monte Carlo will never be a true classic, not like the 69 and 70 MC was or any SS from that era.  It&#039;s just not a classic period!  It&#039;s Chevy trying to stir up artificial nostalgia with Chevy fans.  Why don&#039;t they just come out with something new and bold and use another name and build on it.  All they&#039;re doing now is attempting to squeeze as much as possible they can, by using the &quot;Super Sport&quot; name and it&#039;s tasteless.   No wander Chevy and GM are going under, people see right through this.  What they need to do is not &quot;reinvent&quot; but &quot;invent&quot; something new that attracts new and old buyers alike; Just let the super sport&#039;s name live in the past, and leave it alone, everytime Chevy tries this they fail.  Look at the 2006 Impala SS - come on what was that.... A Ford Taurus on steriods, damn there a disgrace to the SS name.  Come on Chevy get some new material already and maybe you won&#039;t have to have the govt. bail you out next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright &#8211; I know the name &#8220;Super Sport&#8221; is pretty awesome to stamp on any Chevy and especially a Monte Carlo, but honestly there are no more real Super Sports, not after 1972 &#8211; that was it..  The 2006/2007 Monte Carlo will never be a true classic, not like the 69 and 70 MC was or any SS from that era.  It&#8217;s just not a classic period!  It&#8217;s Chevy trying to stir up artificial nostalgia with Chevy fans.  Why don&#8217;t they just come out with something new and bold and use another name and build on it.  All they&#8217;re doing now is attempting to squeeze as much as possible they can, by using the &#8220;Super Sport&#8221; name and it&#8217;s tasteless.   No wander Chevy and GM are going under, people see right through this.  What they need to do is not &#8220;reinvent&#8221; but &#8220;invent&#8221; something new that attracts new and old buyers alike; Just let the super sport&#8217;s name live in the past, and leave it alone, everytime Chevy tries this they fail.  Look at the 2006 Impala SS &#8211; come on what was that&#8230;. A Ford Taurus on steriods, damn there a disgrace to the SS name.  Come on Chevy get some new material already and maybe you won&#8217;t have to have the govt. bail you out next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

